https://legacy.forums.gravityhelp.com/topic/additional-conditional-logic-logical-operators Gravity Support Forums Topic: Additional Conditional Logic logical operators en-US Sun, 19 Apr 2026 21:42:16 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.1 q https://legacy.forums.gravityhelp.com/search.php https://legacy.forums.gravityhelp.com/topic/additional-conditional-logic-logical-operators#post-6302 Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:15:21 +0000 Carl Hancock 6302@https://legacy.forums.gravityhelp.com/ <p>What you are asking about is a little different than conditional logic, it's dynamically generating fields based on some sort of input. Conditional logic show/hides existing fields. What you have outlined would actually create a varying number of fields based on a number selection. Or at least thats the proper way to do it. </p> <p>We would like to introduce this type of functionality in the future, however we have a lot of other features we plan on implementing before we were to get to this. So it isn't going to be something that happens for quite a while. </p> https://legacy.forums.gravityhelp.com/topic/additional-conditional-logic-logical-operators#post-6274 Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:37:25 +0000 Aaron Campbell 6274@https://legacy.forums.gravityhelp.com/ <p>Right now conditional logic only works based on dropdowns, radios, and checkboxes, and it only works with is/is not logic. I'd like to see the ability to use numbers and lessthan/greater than logic as well. In this case it would make sense for it to be able to be based on a number field as well. As a specific example, think of a school site that asks how many children and would like to display fields about what grade each is in. Right now I'd have to create a massive amount of those grade fields. One for if the number of children field is set to 1, two more for if it's set to 2, 3 more for if it's set to 3, etc. If we allow a selection of up to 6 kids, that's 21 grade fields when only 6 should be needed if I could make it show a field if the other field is greater than X.</p> <p>Are there plans for this in the future? </p>