PLEASE NOTE: These forums are no longer utilized and are provided as an archive for informational purposes only. All support issues will be handled via email using our support ticket system. For more detailed information on this change, please see this blog post.

User Notification Routing to Separate Emails

  1. I am build an event registration form and collecting attendee name and email for up to 3 registrations. I would like to notify each attending their registration by email. One person will fill out the form but each attendee receives the email. Here is how I have the Send to configured. Only the first email is receiving the notificaiton however.

    What am I doing wrong?

    Send To* > Configure Routing
    Send to {Attendee 1 Email:72} if email 1 contains @
    Send to {Attendee 2 Email:80} if email 2 contains @
    Send to {Attendee 3 Email:81} if email 3 contains @

    Posted 6 years ago on Wednesday May 22, 2013 | Permalink
  2. http://www.dccfoundation.org/?p=2513&preview=true

    Posted 6 years ago on Wednesday May 22, 2013 | Permalink
  3. I'm not seeing anything strikingly wrong stand out here, but just to confirm are you using "email" fields on your form and what happens if you change up the order of that, meaning if you moved the first one down to be the last would the same email still get the notification and the other two not?

    Also, have you updated to the latest 1.7.4 release that came out yesterday yet?

    Posted 6 years ago on Thursday May 23, 2013 | Permalink
  4. Just updated the plugin.

    The email is going to the first "attendee" only at this point.

    Is there a value (like "true") I can put into the routing that would send out the email if the conditions were met? Like Send to {Attendee 2 Email:80} if email 2 is true

    Posted 6 years ago on Thursday May 23, 2013 | Permalink
  5. You could try send to {Attendee 2 Email:80} if email 2 is not ____ (leave the input blank).

    Posted 6 years ago on Thursday May 23, 2013 | Permalink
  6. I think that did it! Of course, I wasn't thinking logically!

    Posted 6 years ago on Thursday May 23, 2013 | Permalink
  7. Right on!

    Posted 6 years ago on Thursday May 23, 2013 | Permalink

This topic has been resolved and has been closed to new replies.